Corporate Profile
Investor Home
Financial Information
Annual Reports & Proxy
SEC & Regulatory Filings
Insider Filings
As Reported Financials
Credit Ratings
IRS Form 8937
Quarterly Earnings
Events & Presentations
News Releases
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Dividends & Stock Splits
Total Return Calculator
Insider Ownership
Institutional Ownership
Analyst Coverage
Corporate Governance
Board of Directors
Executive Officers
Corporate Structure
Governance Documents
Shareowner Services
Sustainability
Corporate Sustainability Report
EEI and AGA Reports
Other Information
Shareholder FAQ
Contact Us
Email Alerts
Toggle navigation
News. Blogs. & Publications
In The Community
Careers
About
Utilities & Businesses
Investor Relations
Work With Us
Learn About Energy
Institutional Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.
Improving Life with Energy
for 1.28 Million Natural Gas and Electric Utility Customers
in Eight States
Click here to learn more
Prev
0
1
2
3
Next